An argument against mandatory minimum drug sentences

His study thereby underscores the extensive racial disparity in sentencing. What is this bill on mandatory minimum sentences about.

Pros and Cons of Mandatory Minimum Sentences

These defendants, and others like them, occupy a space at the deadly intersection of illicit drugs and violent crime. A defendant can plead guilty as part of a negotiated agreement at arraignment. Multiple DUI offenders are dealt with more harshly under the mandatory minimum sentencing laws.

List of Pros of Mandatory Minimum Sentences 1. But the court did leave some room for a potential innovative argument by defense counsel for drug defendants who also use the illegal substances. State-level actions have included lowering penalties for possession and use of illegal drugs, shortening mandatory minimums or curbing their applicability, removing automatic sentence enhancements, and establishing or extending the jurisdiction of drug courts and other alternatives to the regular criminal justice system.

This report indicated whites are receiving downward departure motion from prosecutors more frequently than blacks and latinos with similar criminal histories and offenses.

Mandatory sentencing

Defendants may hire a private attorney or, if indigent, be appointed a state public defender at no cost. Judicial oversight of the plea negotiation process continues. It also An argument against mandatory minimum drug sentences as though being black is enough probable cause for a police officer to detain any black male.

Mandatory minimum sentences were up for debate on Beacon Hill a few years ago. The Obama administration has endorsed reducing sentences for drug offenders. It is often difficult to differentiate between the types of plea bargains since they are interdependent and have similar outcomes for the system and the defendant.

Cindy tells her story to Rudy mostly over the phone as he struggles to make sense of what their next steps are both legally and as a family. As discussed in Section 1, there is a presumptive penalty for the first DUI conviction and increasingly longer mandatory minimum penalties for the second and third or subsequent DUI convictions.

Criminal Justice Reform Coalition Summit, where he argued that prosecutors just didn't want to relinquish power to judges.

Arguement Against Minimum Drug Sentencing

Mary Keefe, a Worcester Democrat. By going to trial, the defendant risks being found guilty and sentenced to an even harsher sentence than the negotiated sentence, but he or she may be found not guilty of the sexual assault charge and thereby avoid any sentence and the requirement to register as a sex offender.

A trial is an adversarial proceeding between the prosecutor and defense attorney with a judge as the neutral arbiter, which is a shift from the plea bargaining process that relies on a measure of cooperation between all three parties.

In the United States, for example, these laws were first enacted when the Boggs Act of was passed. As stated, at any point during the pre-trial phase, a defendant can agree to plead guilty and accept the negotiated sentence. The number of black drug offenders from has increased to four times that of their white counterparts.

Bernstein described how sentencing guidelines are based on two factors: They also have to hire additional staff to maintain security as well as peace and order in jails and look after the prisoners.

This case reflects police officer attitudes toward persons they believe are not positive contributors to society. The film, it seems, is a coping mechanism for director Valdez, a decent man who has set out to prove through first-hand evidence just how evil these potentially well-intended drug laws are.

Conclusion Mandatory minimum sentences can have positive effects on the justice system and ensure that punishment is given to those who deserve it.

The onset of mandatory minimums has shifted discretion from the judges to prosecutors and caused higher trial rates and often resulted in punishing minor offenders more than major offenders they are already targeting. List of Cons of Mandatory Minimum Sentences.

1. They can be an unfair, one-size-fits-all solution.

8 Pros and Cons of Mandatory Minimum Sentences

The premise surrounding mandatory minimum sentences is that judges have no choice but to award the same minimum punishment to everyone who commits the same crime, without taking their individual circumstances into account.

In a move reminiscent of "tough-on-crime" drug policy from decades ago, a bill in the Arizona House of Representatives calls for mandatory 5-year-minimum prison sentences for first-time heroin and.

In drug cases, mandatory minimum sentences are also often insensitive to factors that could make incapacitation more effective, such as prior criminal history.

Arguement Against Minimum Drug Sentencing

Introduction This paper will be focusing on the controversial issue of mandatory minimum sentences in Canada. There has been much debate over this topic, as it has quickly become implemented for the sentencing of drug offenders, drug-related crimes and banned firearm offences.

Mandatory Minimum Sentences. Crime and its punishment is a public policy concern in which the state legislature has a key role in defining. It is a judicial function to ensure the criminal laws are implemented fairly and in accordance with the law. WASHINGTON — The central argument against the sweeping changes to the war on drugs proposed by the Obama administration and others goes like this: If you take away stringent mandatory minimum sentences for drug crimes, prosecutors can no longer use the fear of prison to flip drug criminals.

An argument against mandatory minimum drug sentences
Rated 5/5 based on 27 review
Mandatory Minimum Sentencing and Black Males